The Chairman of the People's Committee of Tien Lang District acknowledged that the demolished house was located in an area not yet subject to forced demolition, but it was where the pond owner attacked the enforcement forces, so it had to be demolished.
Late in the afternoon of January 12th, the People's Committee of Hai Phong City held a press conference to provide official information about the shooting incident involving the owner of the fish farm, Doan Van Vuon, and his family. Colonel Vu Sy Hung, Deputy Head of the Criminal Investigation Agency of Hai Phong City Police, said that after being arrested, Mr. Vuon and his family realized their criminal actions and expressed their desire for leniency from the law.
District: Land reclamation without compensation is appropriate!
Court: Wrong answer (?!)
Regarding the official letter signed by Judge Ngo Van Anh in response to Mr. Doan Van Vuon on June 25, 2010, Mr. Pham Van Phich, Deputy Chief Justice of the Hai Phong City People's Court, stated that due to an oversight in researching and responding to the citizen's complaint, the judge made a mistake. According to Mr. Phich, in March 2010, the Hai Phong City People's Court handled two administrative appeal cases: One, between Mr. Doan Van Vuon and the Tien Lang District People's Committee; Secondly, Mr. Vu Van Luan also sued the Tien Lang District People's Committee regarding the land reclamation decision. During the process of resolving Mr. Luan's case, the City People's Court made a record to facilitate the parties' agreement on resolving the case. After Mr. Luan withdrew his appeal, the City People's Court issued a decision to suspend the appellate trial. Mr. Phich said that administrative proceedings allow for facilitating agreement. This text is not incorrect.
Regarding Mr. Vuon's case, it was handled by Judge Cao Thanh Ngoc. The People's Court of Ho Chi Minh City did not draw up a settlement agreement for this case. After Mr. Vuon withdrew his appeal, the People's Court of Ho Chi Minh City issued a decision to suspend the case. Therefore, the first-instance judgment is legally effective, upholding the validity of the land reclamation decision of Tien Lang district. Later, Mr. Vuon filed a complaint, alleging that Judge Ngo Van Anh had mistakenly responded to Mr. Luan instead of Mr. Vuon. Due to this oversight, the People's Court of Ho Chi Minh City has reprimanded Judge Ngo Van Anh. When reporters asked why Mr. Ngo Van Anh could mistakenly answer about Mr. Vuon when these were two separate lawsuits handled by two different judges, Mr. Phich said: Although Mr. Ngo Van Anh did not handle the case, as the Chief Judge of the Civil Court, acting on the orders of the Chief Justice of the People's Court of Ho Chi Minh City, he has the responsibility to respond to citizens' petitions. Mr. Phich believes this misunderstanding is regrettable. “Although there was a misunderstanding, the essence of the case remains unchanged,” Mr. Phich said. Regarding the question of why Mr. Vuon's case was not heard on appeal because the court had arranged an agreement with the district to withdraw the complaint and continue leasing the land, Mr. Phich stated that there was no record of such an agreement in the case file.-repeat: initial; background-attachment: initial; background-origin: initial; background-clip: initial; color: #000000; font-family: Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif;">
|
Do British judges mediation of Mr. Vuon's case I was a lay judge at the Hai Phong City People's Court for many years. That day, I was invited to participate in a civil trial at this court. I went to Judge Ngo Van Anh's office to wait for him to arrive. I saw two officials from Tien Lang district in the room, one named Mr. Hoa, and the other whose name I didn't know. On one side were Mr. Luan (Vu Van Luan) and Mr. Vuon (Doan Van Vuon). The court invited them to mediate between the two parties. The two sides agreed that two district officials would persuade Mr. Luan and Mr. Vuon to withdraw their appeals, so the court wouldn't have to hear the case anymore, and the district would lease the land back to them. Mr. Ngo Van Anh, Chief Judge of the Civil Court of the Hai Phong City People's Court, acted as an "arbitrator." Mr. Anh said: "Okay, let's do this. There's a lawsuit here. I'll call both sides up to mediate; we don't have to hear the case. If they withdraw their lawsuits, we won't have to bring it to the appellate court anymore. But we must prioritize letting them lease the land." The other side said, "Then withdraw your lawsuits, we won't have to bring it to the appellate court anymore." The two sides agreed to lease the land back. I don't know exactly what they signed, I only heard them hẹn to go to Tien Lang soon for a dog meat feast… Mr DOAN XUAN LINH, Permanent Vice Chairman of Hai Phong City Catholic Solidarity Committee, Mr. Pham Van Tinh,pdog choly tinspection tofficer qmanagementland: Compensation must be considered The government's decision to reclaim the land without compensation or support for Mr. Vuon is unreasonable. According to the law, if land is reclaimed before the deadline, the land user is entitled to compensation for the land and assets on the land based on the remaining value. If the land is reclaimed on time, no compensation is given for the land itself, but support is provided for structures on the land such as the caretaker's house for aquaculture, water conduits, embankments, etc. In my opinion, the land should be returned to Mr. Vuon's family, ensuring it is within the limits stipulated by law. The remaining area can be leased entirely or partially to Mr. Vuon's family by the local authorities. If only partially leased, the remaining portion can be reclaimed by the local authorities and put up for auction. Mr. Vuon's family should have equal bidding rights with other households in the area. The people's negative reaction and resistance against the enforcement forces was wrong. Such actions are unacceptable. If the people had remained calm, such an unfortunate incident would not have occurred. However, in this case, the government also bears much of the blame, and even coerced the people. In the land reclamation process, it is necessary to explain things clearly to the people. Tien Lang District must rigorously review its own land allocation and reclamation processes. Through this incident, other localities also need to review the allocation, leasing, and reclamation of land, and if they find it unreasonable, they must adjust it. This adjustment will avoid causing harm to the people. Doing so can avoid unnecessary conflicts and disputes between the people and the government... HOANG VAN ghi Should support district enforcement (!) When reporters asked many unanswered questions, Mr. Pham Huu Thu,The Chief of Staff - the spokesperson for the Hai Phong City People's Committee - repeatedly emphasized that the press conference needed to end as soon as possible due to the late hour. He even "bargained" with the reporter, saying, "Just ask one more question, okay?" “In the current context, we shouldn't delve into the circumstances of the offenders but should instead provide information supporting the enforcement actions of Tien Lang district,” Mr. Thu said. Mr. Dao Chung Chinh baseline; baseline; background: transparent; font-style: italic;">Deputy Director General of the General Department of Management dland: The Ministry has requested the Department of Natural Resources and Environment of Hai Phong City to report.
The Ministry of Natural Resources and Environment has requested the Department of Natural Resources and Environment of Hai Phong City to immediately report on the forced land seizure in Tien Lang, Hai Phong. The initial handling of the matter will be done by the local authorities, and the Ministry will then consider it. If the handling is incorrect, the Ministry will intervene. |